| Sector: Education | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-Sector / Technically Autonomous Unit (Network, basin, ..): Public Sector, All Levels | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Component | Present Situation | Target Situation | Projects | Characteristics | Priority | ||||||||||||||||
| Technical Constraints | Cost | Impact | Uncertainty | ||||||||||||||||||
| Sector | Sub-sector | Geographic area | Sp | St | ∆S | Remarks | Description | Min. delay to start (Year) | Min. constr. Period (Year) | Inv Million US$ | Land Value /expro (a') | Yearly maintenance cost (%) | Major rehab/repla cost (c ) % | Span for rehab (d) | Yearly ope. (e) % | Cost description | Uncertainty | (High, Medium, Low) | |||
| Physical Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Education | all levels | Lebanon | Double shifts in some schools | Elimination of double shifts | New schools | 38 | New school map study | construction cost: 38.4 | cost of land | ||||||||||||
| Lack of supply in some urban areas | Improve building quality | Total new sections | 768 | Assembling school study | equipments: 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
| Bad building conditions in some schools | Improve access to good equipments | Availability of land | cost of land (unknown) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Lack of equipments in some schools | K + P + I + S | 10 | Availability of free spaces in existing schools | ||||||||||||||||||
| K + P + I | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| I + S | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| S | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| K | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 1 | 42.2 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | Total | 20% | High social impact | Low | |||||||||||
| Detailed distribution | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Achrafieh | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Mazraa | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Mousaytbeh | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Borj Hammoud | 24 | 2 | 1 | 1.32 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Ghobayre 1 | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2.47 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Ghobayre 2 | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2.47 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Ghobayre 3 | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2.47 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Hadath | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Mreije | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0.99 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Haret Hreik | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0.99 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Hay el sollom | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2.47 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Borj Brajneh | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2.47 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Ouzai | 45 | 2 | 1 | 2.47 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Zouk Mkael | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Jouneih | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tabarja | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Jal el-dib | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Choueifat | 30 | 2 | 1 | 1.65 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Halat | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Mrouj | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Abay | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Rmayleh | 30 | 2 | 1 | 1.65 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 24 | 2 | 1 | 1.32 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 24 | 2 | 1 | 1.32 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 24 | 2 | 1 | 1.32 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 24 | 2 | 1 | 1.32 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Tripoli | 36 | 2 | 1 | 1.98 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Bedaoui | 24 | 2 | 1 | 1.32 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Akkar | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.33 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Zahle | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Chtoura | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Rachaya | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0.66 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| Saida | 30 | 2 | 1 | 1.65 | 3 | 27 | 30 | 26 | 20% | High social Impact | Low | 1 | |||||||||
| 38 new schools | 768 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Institutional Setup | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Compulsory free education is approved but not applied | Apply the law # 686/98 (compulsory free education till 12) | Creation of tools for primary detection of learning difficulties | P1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 20% | High social Impact | Medium | 2 | ||||||||
| Law #686/98 is not applied | Extend this law to include end intermediate (age 15) | Training teachers (reduce drop out) | P2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 | 20% | High social Impact | Medium | 2 | ||||||||
| This law covers till end primary or age 12 | Evaluation of student's performance | P3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 20% | High social Impact | Medium | 2 | |||||||||
| Develop recuperation program for drop-out | P4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 20% | High social Impact | Medium | 2 | ||||||||||
| Training teachers (recuperation) | P5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | 20% | High social Impact | Medium | 2 | ||||||||||
| Periodical project assessment | P6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 20% | High social Impact | Medium | 2 | ||||||||||
| Institutional setup | P7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 20% | High social Impact | Medium | 2 | ||||||||||
| New school map based on the current needs assessment study | Studies | P8 | 1 | 1 | 1.5 | 0% | 100% | 15 | 15% | 40% | High | Low | 2 | ||||||||
| Assembling schools' project | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Institutional framework: creat a Human Ressources Department in the Ministry | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Economic Values: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment (a) Mil US$ | 256 | 298.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Land value/expropriation (a') Mil US$ | 85 | 99 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Yearly maintenance % (b) | 0.50% | 3% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Major rehab/replacement % (c ) | 40% | 30% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Span for rehab/replacement (years) (d) | 15 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Yearly opertion cost % (e) | 150% | 117% | |||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Indicators: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | Number of schools having double shifts = 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| buildings evaluation, including equipments, in line with norms and standards | |||||||||||||||||||||
| reduce drop out rates per level | |||||||||||||||||||||
| reduce failure rates per level | |||||||||||||||||||||
| increase enrollement rates (net and gross) per age bracket | |||||||||||||||||||||
| reduce illiteracy rates per age brackets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Means | |||||||||||||||||||||