| Sector: Transportation | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sub-Sector / Technically Autonomous Unit: Air Transport | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Component | Present Situation | Target Situation | Projects | Characteristics | Priority | |||||||||||||||
| Technical Constraints | Cost | Impact | Uncertainty | |||||||||||||||||
| Sector | Sub-sector | Geographic area | Sp | St | ∆S | Description | Min. delay to start | Min. constr. period | Investment Million US$ | Land value / expro (a') | Yearly maintenance cost (b) | Major rehab/replac. cost (c ) | Span for rehab/replc (d) | Yearly operation cost (e) | Uncertainty | (High, Medium, Low) | ||||
| (Year) | (Year) | % | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Physical Stock | ▪
Beirut Rafic Hariri International Airport (BRHIA), recently upgraded to
provide a capacity of 6 Million passengers/year ▪ Currently the airport is handling about 3.2 million passengers/year ▪ Other runways - at Rayak in the Beqaa, Qolay’at in the north, and other less important runways, none in operation |
▪
Updated Master Plan recommendations for BRHIA completed, and planning
controls around airport enforced to protect air traffic operations ▪ The incorporation of New Large Aircraft (NLA) considerations established ▪ Need for one of the other runways to be dedicated for emergency use (as a backup for BRHIA) identified |
Rehabilitation and development of Rafic Hariri Beirut Airport (Construction) | Existing capacity should be sufficient for traffic in the coming 15 years, but accurate predictions are very hard to make relating to the political developments in Lebanon and the region. | 0 | 1 | 7.5 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | ±10% | To keep the airport operating in a safe and efficient mode. | L | 2 | ||||
| Feasibility study for New Large Aircrafts (NLA) and a backup runway (Study) | the parameters involved in the feasibility cannot be obtained with a high level of accuracy. | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ±20% | Provides a backup runway that has a connection with Beirut free from international borders. | L | 2 | |||||||
| Institutional Setup | ▪ Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in charge of
managing the airport and supervising the air transport activities ▪ Law to create Civil Aviation Authority (CAA - Law No. 481 dated 12/12/2002) awaiting implementation ▪ Some airport activities are subcontracted for private operators under 15 years concession contracts |
▪
CAA fully operational in regulating and supervising airport operations ▪ Beirut International Airport Company (BIAC) created and fully operational in providing services with participation of private sector |
Establishment of Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) | Reallocation of responsibilities could be faced with resistance. | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | ±20% | Enhances control over the airport regulations | L | 2 | ||||
| Establishment of Beirut International Airport Company (BIAC) | Reallocation of responsibilities could be faced with resistance. | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | ±20% | Enhances control over the airport operations | M | 2 | |||||||
| Economic values: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment (a) million US$ | 500 | 510 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Land value / expropriation (a') million US$ | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Yearly maintenance cost % (b) | 5% | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Major rehab/replac. cost % (c ) | 10% | 10% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Span for rehab/replc in years (d) | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Yearly operation cost % (e) | 5% | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Indicators: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ▪ Passenger movement annual growth should be at least equal the rate in the past few years (4.5 to 7%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▪ Number of deflections towards other airports per year: to be determined | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▪ Airport capable to handle NLA when need arises | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Means | ▪ Establishment of CAA, BIAC | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▪ Study on backup airport and NLA | ||||||||||||||||||||