|
|
|
Sector:
Water supply |
|
|
Present Population |
Population (2020) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Sector / Technically
Autonomous Unit: Qbayyat |
|
60,400 |
70,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component |
Present Situation |
Target Situation |
Projects |
Characteristics |
Priority |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Constraints |
Cost |
Impact |
Uncertainty |
|
| Sector |
Sub-sector |
Geographic area |
|
Sp |
St |
∆S |
Remarks |
Description |
Min.
delay to start (Year) |
Min.
constr. Period (Year) |
Million
US$ |
Land
value / expro. (a') % |
Yearly
maintenance cost (b) % |
Major
rehab/replac. cost (c ) % |
Span
for rehab./replc. (d) |
Yearly
operation cost (e) % |
Remarks |
Uncertainty |
|
| |
|
|
Physical Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number and
capacity of treatment plants |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
number and
capacity of reservoirs(m3) |
85 reservoirs
(9750 m3) |
14,000m3 |
66 reservoirs (4,555 m3) for
rehabilitation |
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.14 |
|
1 |
10 |
|
10 |
|
30% |
Reduce water
losses and increase capacity of supply |
Medium |
2 |
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
Length of
network (Transmission+Distribution)(km) |
197 km
transmission, and 156 km distribution |
197 km transmission, and 156 km
distribution |
63 km
transmission and 35 km distribution for renovation |
|
|
1 |
3 |
17.8 |
|
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
15.75
(transmission), 2.1 (distribution) |
30% |
Reduce water losses and increase capacity of
supply |
Medium |
2 |
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
|
|
|
Installation of pumps |
The actual water resources
(32,000m3/day) are sufficient for future demand if the authority conducts
this project |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
0.005 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
|
100% |
|
Low |
3 |
|
| |
|
|
Institutional Setup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Subscriptions
number |
2400 (Without
Lijaan)(12500 with Lijaan) |
17,550 |
|
|
Water Authority should conduct a
survey of the number of local authorities and their number of connections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of Staff |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
Number of water meters |
0 |
17,550 |
4,400 water meters to install |
This number takes into
consideration the connection number of local comities, and the projection of
connection number for 15 years |
|
2 |
4 |
1.1 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
30% |
|
Low |
2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
8,800 water meters to install |
|
|
6 |
8 |
2.2 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
50% |
|
Low |
3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
4,350 water meters to install |
|
|
14 |
4 |
1.1 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
50% |
|
Low |
x |
|
| |
|
|
Management Software |
No |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Economic values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Investment (a) |
29 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Land value / expropriation (a') |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly maintenance cost (b) |
0.2% |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Major rehab/replac. cost (c ) |
1% |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Span for rehab/replc (d) |
19 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly operation cost (e) |
1% |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Performance Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual
quantity of water demand (m3/day)(2006)/Actual quantity of exploited
resources(m3/day) |
12,100/6,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Future
quantity of water demand (m3/day)(horizon 2020)/Actual quantity of exploited
resources(m3/day) |
17,550/6,600 |
Equal or less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of
supply hours/day |
24 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Quality of
water vs. international norms |
The water
quality of resources should be enhanced |
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
% of network
ages more than 35 years |
32%
(transmission), and 23 % distribution |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of
unaccounted for water (%) |
17 % leakage |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Means |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of
staff per 1000 connections |
2.6. This ratio
take into consideration the connections number of local comities, and the
projection of connection number for 15 years |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of
water metering coverage per water authority (%) |
0 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Collection
ratio of fees (%) |
84% |
90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Revenues of
water authority(Billions LL)-expenditures of water authority (Billions LL) |
2002: 0.428-0.5 |
Equal or more than 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0 |
0 |
|
Px |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|