|
|
|
Sector:
Water supply |
|
|
Present Population |
Population (2020) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Sector / Technically
Autonomous Unit: Bcharré |
|
78,000 |
90,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component |
Present Situation |
Target Situation |
Projects |
Characteristics |
Priority |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Constraints |
Cost |
Impact |
Uncertainty |
|
| Sector |
Sub-sector |
Geographic area |
|
Sp |
St |
∆S |
Remarks |
Description |
Min.
delay to start (Year) |
Min.
constr. Period (Year) |
Million US$ |
Land
value / expro. (a') % |
Yearly
maintenance cost (b) % |
Major
rehab/replac. cost (c ) % |
Span
for rehab./replc. (d) |
Yearly
operation cost (e) % |
Remarks |
Uncertainty |
|
| |
|
|
Physical Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number and
capacity of treatment plants |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
Number and
capacity of reservoirs(m3) |
15 reservoirs
(6390 m3) |
18,000m3 |
11 reservoirs
(3,190 m3) for rehabilitation |
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.095 |
|
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
30% |
|
Low |
2 |
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
|
|
|
3160 m3 of
reservoirs for construction |
|
|
2 |
2 |
0.79 |
0.12 |
1 |
10 |
35 |
10 |
|
40% |
|
Low |
3 |
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
Length of
network (Transmission+Distribution)(km) |
17,8 km
(transmission), and 43 km (distribution) |
17,8 km (transmission), and 43
km (distribution) |
16 km
(transmission), and 33 km (distribution) for renovation |
|
|
1 |
2 |
6 |
|
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
4 (transmission),
1.98 (distribution) |
30% |
|
Low |
2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
The available
resources are sufficient to meet domestic demand. This region is rich in
water. Total capacity of resources= 90,200 m3/day (winter), and 24,500
(summer). 250 Ha are actually irrigated (total irrigated area= 2,500 Ha) |
The
available resources are sufficient to meet future domestic demand. |
Water Supply
Project in Bcharré |
This Project is financed by
AFESD protocole |
|
0.5 |
3 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium |
1 |
|
| |
|
|
Institutional Setup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Subscriptions
number |
3,750 |
22,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of Staff |
17 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water |
|
North Leb. |
Number of water meters |
0 |
22,650 |
5,700 water
meters for installation |
|
|
2 |
4 |
1.4 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
|
30% |
|
Low |
3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
11,400 water
meters for installation |
|
|
6 |
8 |
2.8 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
|
50% |
|
Low |
x |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
5,550 water
meters for installation |
|
|
14 |
4 |
1.4 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
|
50% |
|
Low |
x |
|
| |
|
|
Management Software |
No |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Economic values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Investment (a) |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Land value / expropriation (a') |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly maintenance cost (b) |
0.0% |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Major rehab/replac. cost (c ) |
0% |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Span for rehab/replc (d) |
26 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly operation cost (e) |
0% |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Performance Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual
quantity of water demand (m3/day)(2006)/Actual quantity of exploited
resources(m3/day) |
15,600/35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Future
quantity of water demand (m3/day)(horizon 2020)/Actual quantity of exploited
resources(m3/day) |
22,650/35,000 |
Equal or less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of
supply hours/day |
NA |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Quality of
water vs. international norms |
Good |
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
% of network
ages more than 35 years |
90 %
(transmission), and 76 % (distribution) |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of
unaccounted for water (%) |
54 % UFW (24%
leakage, and 30% illegal connections) |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Means |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of
staff per 1000 connections |
1.68 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of
water metering coverage per water authority (%) |
0 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Collection
ratio of fees (%) |
52% |
90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Revenues of
water authority(Billions LL)-expenditures of water authority (Billions LL) |
2002: 386-195 |
Equal or more than 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
P0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Px |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|