|
|
|
Sector:
Water supply |
|
|
Present Population |
Population (2020) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Sector / Technically
Autonomous Unit: Nabee El-Tasseh |
213,000 |
247,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component |
Present Situation |
Target Situation |
Projects |
Characteristics |
Priority |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Constraints |
Cost |
Impact |
Uncertainty |
|
| Sector |
Sub-sector |
Geographic area |
|
Sp |
St |
∆S |
Remarks |
Description |
Min.
delay to start (Year) |
Min.
constr. Period (Year) |
Inv.
Million US$ |
Land
value / expro. (a') Mil US$ |
Yearly
maintenance cost (b) % |
Major
rehab/replac. cost (c ) % |
Span
for rehab./replc. (d) (Yesr) |
Yearly
operation cost (e) % |
Remarks |
Uncertainty |
|
| |
|
|
Physical Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number and capacity of treatment
plants |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number and capacity of
reservoirs(m3) |
178, 32300m3 |
49,500m3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Length of network
(Transmission+Distribution)(km) |
241 km
(transmission), and 590 km (distribution) |
241 km (transmission), and 626
km (distribution) |
Nabee El-Tasseh project
(Rehabilitation of systems E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, and E7 of Nabeh El Tasseh.
This project is currently conducted by CDR; $35mil) |
|
This project
should be conducted after the master plan for the office. Two studies should
be conducted: 1-Diagnostic the potential of Nabeh El-tasseh (Hydro-geological
study); and 2-optimize water resources management in the area (use of Nabee
El-Tasseh resources or ground water resources?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase capacity of
water: 15,000 m3/day. |
|
3 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
|
|
|
Nabatieh
project includes rehabilitation of 7.5 km of existing transmission line from
Nabeh El Tasseh |
|
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
1 |
10 |
35 |
10 |
|
20% |
Low |
High |
1 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
|
|
|
Nabatieh project It includes:
Construction of 24 new reservoirs. Laying 85 km new transmission pipelines.
Laying 67 km distribution networks. |
|
Conduct
feasibility study |
2 |
5 |
10 |
0.12 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
20% |
Low |
|
2 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
|
|
|
Anane Nabatieh-Conveyor (Enlarge
Anane Reservoir) (Construct canal project: 11,725 km, Construct a treatment
plant with 170 l/s (15,000 m3/day), Construct reservoirs) Irrigation of 3500
Ha, and domestic supply of around 5,3 Mm3/year in phase 1 (16 Mm3/year for 4
phases) |
|
Feasibility
study to be updated |
4 |
10 |
39 |
0.5 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
|
|
|
High |
3 |
|
| |
|
|
Institutional Setup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Subscriptions number |
53,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of Staff |
88 |
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
Number of water meters |
0 |
64,825 |
Implement 15,500 water meters |
|
|
2 |
4 |
3.9 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
30% |
|
Low |
3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Implement 31,000 water meters |
|
|
4 |
8 |
7.8 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
30% |
|
Low |
x |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Implement 18,325 water meters |
|
|
8 |
4 |
4.6 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
30% |
|
Low |
x |
|
| |
|
|
Management Software |
No |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Economic values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Investment (a) |
47 |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Land value / expropriation (a') |
6 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly maintenance cost (b) % |
0.7% |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Major rehab/replac. cost (c ) % |
2% |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Span for rehab/replc (d) (Year) |
11 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly operation cost (e) |
3% |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Performance Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual quantity of water demand
(m3/day)(2006)/Actuel quantity of exploited resources(m3/day) |
43,000/113,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Future quantity of water demand
(m3/day)(horizon 2020)/Actuel quantity of exploited resources(m3/day) |
61,800/113,000 |
Equal or less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of supply hours/day |
NA |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Quality of water vs.
international norms |
Good |
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
% of network ages more than 35
years |
90 %
(adduction), 0 (distribution) |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of unaccounted for
water (%) |
15 % UFW (5%
leakage, 10 % illegal connections) |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Means |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of staff per 1000
connections |
1.35 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of water metering
coverage per water authority (%) |
0 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Collection ratio of fees (%) |
83% |
90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Revenues of water
authority(Billions LL)-expenditures of water authority (Billions LL) |
8.6-6.2 |
Equal or more than 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Px |
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|