|
|
|
Sector:
Water supply |
|
|
Present Population |
Population (2020) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Sector / Technically
Autonomous Unit: Saida |
|
200,000 |
232,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component |
Present Situation |
Target Situation |
Projects |
Characteristics |
Priority |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Constraints |
Cost |
Impact |
Uncertainty |
|
| Sector |
Sub-sector |
Geographic area |
|
Sp |
St |
∆S |
Remarks |
Description |
Min.
delay to start (Year) |
Min.
constr. Period (Year) |
Million
US$ |
Land
value / expro. (a') % |
Yearly
maintenance cost (b) % |
Major
rehab/replac. cost (c ) % |
Span
for rehab./replc. (d) |
Yearly
operation cost (e) % |
Remarks |
Uncertainty |
|
| |
|
|
Physical Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number and capacity of treatment
plants |
El Faouar,
10000 m3/day |
El Faouar, 10000 m3/day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
Number and capacity of
reservoirs(m3) |
3; 5225 m3 |
46,400 m3 |
Rehabilitation
of the main reservoir (5000 m3) |
|
|
1 |
3 |
0.15 |
|
1 |
10 |
35 |
10 |
|
30% |
Reduce leakage |
Low |
2 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
|
|
|
Construction
of reservoirs (19,275m3) |
|
|
1 |
4 |
4.8 |
1.6 |
1 |
10 |
35 |
10 |
|
40% |
Increase
capacity of storage |
Low |
3 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
Length of network
(Transmission+Distribution)(km) |
ND
(Transmission), 90 km (distribution) |
ND+10km (Transmission), 90 km
(distribution) |
Renovation of
6.8 km of distribution line |
|
|
1 |
3 |
0.95 |
|
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
0.75
(Transmission), and 0.18 (Distribution) |
50% |
Reduce leakage |
Low |
1 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
|
|
|
Extension of
the transmission line 3 km (from Kfaroué source) |
|
|
1 |
3 |
0.75 |
|
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
50% |
|
Low |
1 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
|
|
|
Additional
10,000 m3 of water are required |
|
Feasibility
study required |
7 |
2 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
50% |
|
Medium |
1 |
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
|
|
|
Construction of
5 km of transmission lines |
|
|
5 |
3 |
1.2 |
|
1 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
50% |
|
Medium |
3 |
|
| |
|
|
Institutional Setup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Subscriptions number |
17,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of Staff |
40 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water |
|
South Leb. |
Number of water meters |
15,000 |
58,500 |
10,875 water
meters to install (2000 in Maamariyé) |
|
|
1 |
4 |
2.7 |
|
1 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
30% |
|
Low |
2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
21,750 water
meters to install (2000 in Maamariyé) |
|
|
5 |
8 |
5.4 |
|
1 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
|
50% |
|
Low |
3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
10,875 water
meters to install (2000 in Maamariyé) |
|
|
13 |
4 |
2.7 |
|
1 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
|
50% |
|
Low |
x |
|
| |
|
|
Management Software |
No |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Economic values: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Investment (a) |
14 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Land value / expropriation (a') |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly maintenance cost (b) |
2.3% |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Major rehab/replac. cost (c ) |
8% |
10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Span for rehab/replc (d) |
13 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Yearly operation cost (e) |
9% |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Performance Indicators: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual quantity of water demand
(m3/day)(2006)/Actuel quantity of exploited resources(m3/day) |
40,000 /39,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Future quantity of water demand
(m3/day)(horizon 2020)/Actuel quantity of exploited resources(m3/day) |
58,000 /39,000 |
Equal or less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of supply hours/day |
24 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Quality of water vs.
international norms |
Good |
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
% of network ages more than 35
years |
NA |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of unaccounted for
water (%) |
7% Unaccounted
for water (5% leakage) |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Means |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of staff per 1000
connections |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of water metering
coverage per water authority (%) |
88% |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Collection ratio of fees (%) |
88% |
90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Revenues of water
authority(Billions LL)-expenditures of water authority (Billions LL) |
2003: 3.32-2.4 |
Equal or more than 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P1 |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
P0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Px |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|